Guo Li, Lyu Jinan, Feng Feng, Wang Qiang. CFD verification and weak compressibility correction of unsteady aerodynamic force models applied to high-amplitude oscillating incoming flows[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2017, 35(1): 93-100. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0065
Citation: Guo Li, Lyu Jinan, Feng Feng, Wang Qiang. CFD verification and weak compressibility correction of unsteady aerodynamic force models applied to high-amplitude oscillating incoming flows[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2017, 35(1): 93-100. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0065

CFD verification and weak compressibility correction of unsteady aerodynamic force models applied to high-amplitude oscillating incoming flows

More Information
  • Received Date: May 24, 2015
  • Revised Date: October 25, 2015
  • Available Online: January 07, 2021
  • The two-dimensional airfoil theories of Isaacs and Greenberg for unsteady aerodynamic forces are widely adopted to estimate the aerodynamic performance of wind-turban blades and helicopter blade loads. The models are established under the assumption that the incoming flow is incompressible and without viscosity. However, the viscosity and compressibility are inevitable and the applicability of the model to predict the aerodynamic force in real flows needs to be checked. For the viscous effects, Strangfeld et al. verified the models experimentally using the data of NACA 0018 from wind tunnel at Reynolds number 0.25 million in 2014. The Mach number of the experiment is near 0.0326, which makes the flow almost incompressible. To check the effects of compressibility, a numerical simulation of NACA 0018 is conducted. For verification, the result of Strangfeld et al. at Mach number 0.0326 is repeated using CFD. The simulation further extends to the Mach number 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 cases to investigate performance of the model at higher Mach numbers. The results show that maximum lift coefficient increases and the phase lags with Mach number increasing. Maximum overshot is at Mach number 0.3, which is over 50% more than the prediction of the models. The results show that the compressibility is non-negligible and the Mach number is needed to be taken into account as a sensitive factor. To extend the application range of Mach number, a correction is added to the models to account the influence of weak compressibility. The correction relates the variation of density of the incoming flow to the Mach number changing, which changes the density near the airfoil. As the aerodynamic force are proportional to the density, the correction would increase the aerodynamic force as Mach number increases. Using the correction, the differences of the models and simulation is within 5%.
  • [1]
    Theodorsen T. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter[R]. NACA Rep No. 496, 1935:413-433.
    [2]
    Isaacs R. Airfoil theory for flows of variable velocity[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1945, 12(1):113-117. doi: 10.2514/8.11202
    [3]
    Isaacs R. Airfoil theory for rotary wing aircraft[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1946, 13(4):218-220. doi: 10.2514/8.11351
    [4]
    Greenberg J M. Airfoil in sinusoidal motion in a pulsating stream[R]. NACA TN1326, 1947.
    [5]
    Mateescu D, Neculita S. Low frequency oscillations of thin airfoils in subsonic compressible flows[C]//44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2006.
    [6]
    William P Walker, Mayuresh J Patil. Unsteady aerodynamics of deformable thin airfoils[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(6):1673-1680. doi: 10.2514/1.C031434
    [7]
    Ramesh K, Gopalarathnam A, Edwards J R, et al. Theoretical analysis of perching and hovering maneuvers[R]. AIAA 2013-3194.
    [8]
    Cho S H, Kim T, Song S J. Freestream Pulsation Effects on the Aeroelastic Response of a Finite Wing[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(11):2723-2729. doi: 10.2514/1.33731
    [9]
    刘启宽, 李亮, 张志军, 等.风力机叶片大挠度挥舞振动特性分析[J].动力学与控制学报, 2012, 10(2):171-177. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXK201202015.htm

    Liu Q, Li L, Zhang Z, et al. Flapwise characteristics of a wind turbine blade with large deflection[J]. Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2012, 10(2):171-177. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXK201202015.htm
    [10]
    Williams D, Quach V, Kerstens W, et al. Low-Reynolds number wing response to an oscillating freestream with and without feed forward control[R]. AIAA 2009-143.
    [11]
    Jose A I, Baeder J D. Steady and unsteady aerodynamic modeling of trailing edge flaps with overhang and gap using CFD and lower order models[R]. AIAA 2009-1071.
    [12]
    Strangfeld C, Müller-Vahl H, Greenblatt D, et al. Airfoil subjected to high-amplitude free-stream oscillations:theory and experiments[C]//7th AIAA Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2014.
    [13]
    Mian H H, Gang Wang, Raza M A. Application and validation of HUNS3D flow solver for aerodynamic drag prediction cases[C]//Proceedings of 201310th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2013:209-218.
    [14]
    Liou Meng Sing. A sequel to AUSM, Part Ⅱ:AUSM+-up for all speeds[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 214:137-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.09.020
    [15]
    Spalart P R, Allmaras S R. A one-equation turbulence model for Aerodynamic flows[J]. Le Recherche Aerospatiale, 1994, 1:5-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236888804_A_One-Equation_Turbulence_Model_for_Aerodynamic_Flows
    [16]
    Katz J, Plotkin A. Low-speed aerodynamics[M]. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • Related Articles

    [1]CHEN Shiyi, WANG Jianchun, ZHENG Qinmin, WANG Xiaoning, TENG Jian, WAN Minping. Multi-scale analyses of compressible turbulence[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2021, 39(1): 1-17. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0159
    [2]GAO Zhenxun, JIANG Chongwen, LEE Chunhian. Progress of the studies on the extension of flamelet models to supersonic combustion flows[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2020, 38(4): 651-659. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0144
    [3]CAI Linfeng, LI Haoge, ZHAO Wenwen, CHEN Weifang. Application of simplified three-equation transition model in hypersonic flow[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2019, 37(6): 945-949. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0172
    [4]Xiaotian Shi, Wei Wang, Guiru Zhang, Tiejin Wang, Chi-wang Shu. Numerical Simulation of Large Scale Structures and Compressibility Effect in Compressible Mixing Layers with a Discontinuous Galerkin Method[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2016, 34(2): 224-231. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2016.0004
    [5]Xia Chenchao, Jiang Tingting, Guo Zhongzhou, Chen Weifang. Effects of compressibility correction on γ-Reθ transition model[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2015, 33(5): 603-609. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2014.0068
    [6]HAN Xing-si, YE Tao-hong, ZHU Min-ming, CHEN Yi-liang. A new k-ε turbulence model with compressibility modifications[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2009, 27(6): 677-682.
    [7]Xiang Da-ping, DENG Xiao-gang, MAO Mei-liang. Study of slightly compressible model(SCM) and compressible N-S equations on low Mach number flow computation[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2005, 23(2): 195-199.
    [8]Parallel computation for low mach number flows[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2002, 20(z1): 77-81,8.
    [9]Study on a novel method for low mach number flows computation[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2002, 20(4): 373-378.
    [10]Liang Dewang, Wang Guoqing. Modification of Two-Equation Turbulence Models with Compressibility and its Application[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2000, 18(1): 98-104.

Catalog

    Article views (259) PDF downloads (580) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return