基于贝叶斯优化方法的多级压缩进气道宽速域运行性能优化

Wide-range optimization of multi-stage compression inlet based on Bayesian optimization method

  • 摘要: 针对多级压缩进气道宽速域运行性能优化问题,本文构建了基于高斯过程模型和Thompson采样的贝叶斯优化方法。以喉道参数为研究对象,基于CFD方法和等效热力过程分析方法对全流道比冲进行评估;并在马赫数为6的设计点和Ma = 4~6宽速域范围分别开展了单目标和三目标全流道比冲优化。结果表明,流量系数和喉道总压恢复系数是影响全流道比冲的主要因素,全流道比冲并不随喉道总压恢复系数单调变化,而是与等效热力过程分析方法确定的亚声速加热模态存在最优的匹配状态,设计点优化构型使全流道比冲提升了5.66%;宽速域优化提高了进气道流量捕获能力,提升了内压缩段分离区自适应调节能力,分离区通过气动喉道壅塞作用实现了进气道与燃烧室的更优匹配,宽速域优化构型在Ma = 4、5、6全流道中比冲分别提升66.17%、6.13%和4.03%。

     

    Abstract: A Bayesian optimization method based on a Gaussian process model and Thompson sampling is proposed to optimize the performance of a multi-stage compression inlet across a wide Mach number range. The objective function, defined as the specific impulse of the entire thrust tunnel, is evaluated by combining computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the inlet flow fields and an equivalent thermodynamic process analysis of the engine combustion process. A single-objective optimization at Ma = 6 design point and a three-objective optimization across Ma = 4~6 operating range are carried out. It is found that the mass flow coefficient and total pressure recovery coefficient of the throat are the dominating factors affecting the specific impulse, which does not change monotonously with the total pressure recovery coefficient alone. When the inlet works at the critical back pressure and the combustor operates in a subsonic heating mode, optimal matching is achieved between the inlet and combustor, yielding the highest specific impulse. The optimized design at Ma = 6 point resulted in a 5.66% improvement in specific impulse. Furthermore, the wide-range optimization enhances the flow capture capacity of the inlet and improves the adaptive regulation capability of the separation zone within the internal compression section. By leveraging the choking effect of the aerodynamic throat, the inlet achieves superior matching with the combustor. Accordingly, the specific impulse of the optimized configuration increases by 66.17%, 6.13%, and 4.03% at Ma = 4, 5, and 6 for the entire flow passage, respectively.

     

/

返回文章
返回