热激励在超声速进气道内对激波诱导的边界层分离的控制机理

Control of shock/boundary layer interaction in supersonic inlet using thermal excitation

  • 摘要: 通过数值模拟的方法研究了马赫5的超声速进气道内,热激励对激波/边界层相互作用的控制机理。研究了热激励器放热功率(E)、热激励器展向放置数目(N)和热激励器到控制激波的距离(S)三个参数在超声速进气道内激波控制和边界层分离改善中的表现。分别针对以下四种条件进行了数值模拟:1)E=2kW、N=2、S=0.02m;2)E=3kW、N=2、S=0.02m; 3)E=2kW、N=3、S=0.02m ;4)E=2kW、N=2、S=0m。分析发现:在以上四种条件下, 均可观察到热激励在控制激波和改善激波诱导边界层分离上有着显著的效果。热激励器的放热功率对激波的控制效果有着明显的影响,在本文所考虑的热激励能量范围内,放热功率越大,原激波角的改变越大,最终分离区的改变越明显;展向放置的热激励器数目N影响着输入到流场的能量密度,并且N越大,壁面附近的激波面越趋于平面。尽管N对上壁面沿展向的压力分布无明显影响,但对上壁面分离区大小有明显的影响;对比条件1和4下的计算结果,发现S=0.02m可以得到很好的控制效果,而S=0m时流场结构几乎没有变化,这就表明热激励器必须放置在控制激波上游的一定距离处才会有预期的效果。

     

    Abstract: A numerical study was performed to investigate the effects of thermal excitation using surface discharges in Mach 5 supersonic inlet by solving the unsteady Navier-Stokes equations .Three parameters, including the input power of thermal actuators (E), the number of thermal actuators (N) and the distance between actuator to the first compression corner, were used to study their effects on the control of shock wave and improvement of boundary layer separation. Four cases, which include 1) E =2kW, N =2, S =0.02m; 2) E =3kW, N =2, S =0.02m; 3) E =2kW, N =3, S =0.02m; 4) E =2kW, N =2, S =0m, were considered. From the results for all four cases, it can be observed that the thermal excitation shows significant effect on the control of shock wave and improvement of boundary layer separation induced by shock wave. The heating power of thermal actuator has obvious effect on the control of shock wave. Within the scope of thermal excitation energy considered in this paper, the greater heating power, the greater change of the original shock wave angle, and finally the more obvious change of the separation. The number of thermal actuator N along the spanwise direction affected the energy intensity that input to the air flow. The greater N, the flatter the shock wave surface near the wall. Although the number N did not have significant effect on the spanwise direction pressure distribution of the upper wall, but it had obvious effect on the size of separation on the upper wall. Comparison between cases 1 and 4 showed that the S =0.02m can get a very good control effect, and the S =0m had little effect on the flow structure. This indicated that the thermal actuator must be placed upstream of the control shock with a certain distance.

     

/

返回文章
返回