基于S-A与SSG/LRR-ω两种湍流模型的CHN-T1标模计算与分析

Numerical inverstigation and discussion on CHN-T1 benchmark model using Spalart-Allmaras model and SSG/LRR-ω model

  • 摘要: 通过求解雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程,对第一届AeCW-1研讨会上要求的所有工况进行了计算,着重研究S-A湍流模型和雷诺应力模型在CHN-T1标模上的表现,评估两种湍流模型的网格收敛性,对抖振特性的模拟能力以及对雷诺数的敏感性。根据与实验数据的对比分析,得出主要结论如下:两种湍流模型都能趋向于网格收敛,雷诺应力模型的网格收敛更快。在较大迎角的工况,两种湍流模型对机翼上激波诱导的分离流有较大的差别。CHN-T1标模的尾撑,改变了飞机平尾的压力分布,并且在飞机机尾上产生复杂的三维分离流动,对俯仰力矩系数的准确计算产生了较大的影响。考虑静气弹效应,两种湍流模型计算的力矩系数比不考虑静气弹效应更大,雷诺应力模型的偏差更大。在高雷诺数工况,两种湍流模型的计算结果趋于一致。

     

    Abstract: By solving Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations, all cases of the CHN-T1 benchmark aircraft configuration from the first AeCW-1 conference were investigated in detail using Spalart-Allmaras model and Reynolds stress model, respectively. The behaviors of the two models on this test case were specifically discussed and investigated, in order to evaluate the ability regarding approach the grid convergence, the accuracy for the prediction of the aircraft operating near the buffeting envelop, as well as the sensitivity of the two models to Reynolds number. After comparing the computations with the experimental data, the main conclusions are organized as the following:Both turbulence models can achieve final grid convergence, and the RSM can faster grid convergence than the S-A model. For the cases with high angles of attack, where shock-induced separation can occur, the computations using the two models significantly differ to each other. The tail-supporting string of the CHN-T1 model has a great impact on the pressure distribution of the horizontal tail. The present of the tail-supporting string induces a complex turbulence separation on the tail of the fuselage, which is difficult to be predicted accurately. The computations with the static aeroelastic deformation yield poor agreement of the moment coefficient with the experimental data, especially for the RSM model. For cases operating at higher Reynolds number, the results predicted by the two models are closer.

     

/

返回文章
返回