平面叶栅风洞流场品质主被动调控技术对比

Comparison of Active and passive control techniques for flow field quality in a linear cascade wind tunnel

  • 摘要: 高负荷状态下压气机平面叶栅试验流场品质通常不佳,需借助调控手段提升流场品质以确保试验数据可用。基于亚声速平面叶栅风洞设计了可调尾板的被动方案,研究了尾板角对大攻角状态下叶栅流场品质及性能的影响,并与之前开展研究的上端壁抽吸主动方案的结果进行对比。研究表明:可调尾板通过改变叶栅出口静压分布来调节叶栅进口流场品质。随着尾板角安装减小,靠近上尾板的叶栅出口静压减小,靠近下尾板的叶栅出口静压增大。减小尾板角有利于提升叶栅流场品质,但存在临界安装角使叶栅进出口流场品质总体较好;由于尾板对出口气流的隔离作用,叶栅出气角周期性最好,周期性指数在1以内;超过临界安装角后流场品质下降。上端壁抽吸对叶栅进口流场均匀性的改善比可调尾板更好。由于两种手段的调控机理和流场品质差异,可调尾板调控后叶栅出气角比上端壁抽吸偏小2°左右,损失偏大约0.02;两者的静压比和叶片表面等熵马赫数差异较小。

     

    Abstract: The flow quality of the linear cascade tests for compressor airfoils is always poor under high-load conditions, it is necessary to improve flow quality of linear cascade by adjusting methods to ensure the availability of test data. A passive control scheme of adjustable tailboard was designed based on a subsonic plane cascade wind tunnel, and the effect of tailboard angle on flow quality and performance of cascade was investigated, and compared with the results of active control scheme of upper end-wall suction previously studied. The results indicate that the inlet and outlet flow quality of subsonic linear cascade can be adjusted by tailboards for which changing the static pressure distribution at cascade exit. As the tailboard angle decreases, the exit static pressure of cascade near the upper tailboard decreases, while the exit static pressure near the lower tailboard increases. Reducing the tailboard angle is conducive to improving the flow quality of cascade, but there is a critical value of tailboard angle at which both the inflow and outflow quality of cascade are good, and the loss and exit flow angle show good periodicity. And the periodicity of outlet flow angle shows best due to the isolating effect of tailboard, and the periodicity index of outlet flow angle is less than one. The flow quality of cascade declines when over the critical value. The improvement of inflow quality of cascade by upper end wall suction is better than that of tailboard. Due to the difference of control mechanism and flow quality between these two methods, the outlet flow angle of cascade adjusted by tailboard is about 2° smaller than that of upper end wall suction, and the loss is about 0.02 larger than that of upper end wall suction, and the difference of static pressure ratio and distribution of isentropic Mach number is small.

     

/

返回文章
返回