完全催化壁驻点高超声速流动加热地面模拟方法研究

Ground simulation method of full catalytic stagnation point aeroheating for hypersonic flow field

  • 摘要: 在地面高焓风洞中准确模拟高超声速头部驻点区化学反应流动加热,从平衡边界层和冻结边界层驻点气动加热公式出发,分析了离解焓对不同催化特性驻点加热的影响、地面风洞非平衡来流条件下头激波后的流场参数变化规律和与天上飞行条件的差异,分析了壁面催化特性对流场参数的影响,建立了地面高焓风洞模拟完全催化壁驻点气动加热的模拟准则:只要在风洞条件下实现对驻点压力ps、驻点速度梯度βe、来流总焓hs的模拟,则能够复现天上状态的气动热载荷。针对不同半径的飞行器头部驻点开展化学非平衡流场数值模拟进行了验证,表明:地面风洞无法完全模拟飞行器头部绕流流场参数,材料的催化特性对壁面附近流场中的N、O组元和壁面热流影响较大;地面风洞采用半径1:1的模型模拟完全催化壁驻点加热会偏低于天上状态,而根据三参数模拟准则确定的模型尺寸能够同时复现天上状态驻点区的焓、压力、热流,且随着飞行器头部半径增大头部驻点线近壁面附近的温度、组元N、O梯度与天上会趋于一致。

     

    Abstract: High enthalpy shock tunnel flow field is different from that of flight condition, and accurate simulation of chemical reaction aeroheating at stagnation point is very important for hypersonic vehicle. Based on equilibrium boundary layer and frozen boundary layer stagnation heating formula, the effects of the dissociation enthalpy were analyzed on the aeroheating on stagnation point with different catalycity characteristics. We also analyzed the differences between the ground wind tunnel experiments and flight data with respect to the variation in non-equilibrium flow head after head shock wave, the influence of surface catalytic characteristics of the flow field parameters. The simulation criteria are propsed for establishment of a ground high enthalpy wind tunnel simulation of fully catalytic wall stagnation aerodynamic heating. As long as the simulation is valid for the stagnation pressure, stagnation velocity gradient, flow enthalpy in wind tunnel conditions, the sky flight state aerodynamic heating is reproducible. According to different tests carried out with different size models, numerical simulation is verified for chemical non-equilibrium flow field. The results show that the ground wind tunnel simulation cannot simulate the parameters of the flow field near the stagnation zone. The catalytic properties of materials have great impact on the flow field near the wall with N and O elements. The aeroheating at stagnation point of complete catalysis wall from ground 1:1 simulation is lower than that from the flight data, while the flight status of the stagnation zone regarding the enthalpy, the pressure, and the heat flux can be reproduced according to the model size detemined by three parameters simulation criterion. With head radius increasing, the simulation and flight data tend to be identical with respect to the wall temperature and the gradients of the N and O components near the stagnation line.

     

/

返回文章
返回